CattyIdiot and Rauhauser Jabber Conversation Dec 15 2014

This jabber conversation between Neal Rauhauser and cattyidiot was posted on pastebin. The conversation is dated December 15th, 2014 and most likely posted by Neal. 


“JD” would be Neal’s lawyer Jeffrey Dorrell, “VVF” would be Tom Retzlaff’s libel blahg ViaViewFiles

(08:22:13 PM) Attempting to start a private conversation with cattyidiot@jabber.se…

[Image] (08:22:15 PM) Private conversation with cattyidiot@jabber.se/39541530931418686530239434 started.  Your client is not logging this conversation.

(08:26:08 PM) nealr@jabber.se/28076057461418692921929929: Well, looks like this is the end, ya little furball.

(09:48:53 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: The end of what?

(10:00:00 PM) nealr@jabber.se/28076057461418692921929929: Well, everything.

(10:00:20 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: Sounds ominous.

(10:00:39 PM) nealr@jabber.se/28076057461418692921929929: Had a nice long talk with JD tonight and a few others. Gonna just ignore you, ignore VVF, and wait for the appeals court to do its work.

(10:01:05 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: Oh.

(10:01:06 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: 🙁

(10:01:25 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: I have to say in weird way I do miss you when you aren’t round.

(10:04:00 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: Uhm…

(10:04:03 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: Wait…

(10:04:15 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: You just finished in the appeals court.

(10:04:22 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: You mean the trial court?

(10:06:44 PM) nealr@jabber.se/28076057461418692921929929: Nah, we’re expecting rehearing, then a trip to supreme court. There are a dozen TCPA related cases queued up, mine is among the more interesting.

(10:07:29 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: A rehearing? But you won!

(10:11:17 PM) nealr@jabber.se/28076057461418692921929929: it’s a low cost delaying tactic, and someone is going to have to sort out things with a supreme court visit.

(10:11:37 PM) nealr@jabber.se/28076057461418692921929929: A similar case was kinda interesting – $350k in legal fees, then $250k in sanctions.

(10:22:30 PM) nealr@jabber.se/28076057461418692921929929: The best parts were the procedural errors, from the initial Texas filing through the dismissal w/o prejudice. Leiderman is so damned incompetent it’s hilarious.

(10:24:33 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: Sorry man. I was in the loo. Post-dinner. always happens.

(10:25:07 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: I was barely paying attention back when Leiderman was “of counsel”.

(10:25:37 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: Well, this is mind-blowing, really.

(10:25:58 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: Of all the scenarios I personally saw coming…. having the winner appeal the case was not one of them.

(10:27:25 PM) cattyidiot@jabber.se: Hey, listen… I’ve got to head and off and get to the gym before they close. I’ll be back on in about 90 minutes.